Malcolm Turnbull tells us all that there is

“Masses of evidence”

to support the annihilation of Sunday penalty rates for retail and hospitality staff.

Realistically we all know there will be masses of conflicting evidence to go along with it, but I for one am pleased that Turnbull is basing his government’s direction on “masses of evidence” and not an ideological position, and I hope it’s a trend that continues in other areas.

Carbon pricing and emissions trading schemes for example.

I’d like to see Turnbull implement policy based on the overwhelming masses of evidence available. Hell, even the recommendations of their own review would be nice rather than the ridiculous ideological position his party holds now.

Or what about coal and energy?

Perhaps if Turnbull went with the masses of evidence that indicate the whole idea of clean coal has all the probability of a fragrant turd it would be a healthy start. Instead we have the Turnbull govt actually considering investing taxpayer dollars in a hair-brained scheme that no other sucker would put a dime into, developing clean-coal fired power stations. Not that this is ideological of course…

Image is a part of the 100 Stakhanov's project-one of the archetype identity projects. Coal is responsible for more than 40% of the world energy and situation would not change in the next decade. Miners are the archetype of the working class, their working conditions are almost the same as 100 years ago, death toll due to accidents is the highest among all of the professions. Million tones of black coal cost 1-2 lives on average. Project shot at the biggest mine in Europe named after Stakhanov. Stakhanov was the first who in 1935 made labour a matter of heroism. In Soviet Union in 1938 award Hero of Labour became highest award equal to the Hero of War . Gleb Kosorukov ©

The Coalitions message on penalty rates is a confused one at best, which is probably why they are leaving the tough sell to their new Coalition partner Pauline Hanson to debate. This frees up Turnbull to focus on taking cheap shots at Shorten about not backing the umpire.

The gist of the argument is that unionised retailers that have negotiated Enterprise Bargain Agreements (EBA’s) with their workers and pay their staff lower rates on Sunday that make it impossible for the small business to compete.

This all sounds fair enough until you actually stop and think about the logic behind it.

If having a unionised workforce meant you paid lower wages, then wouldn’t every small business want their staff unionised?

Why would small business be so opposed to unions if they lowered the cost of business?

The reality is that workers on an EBA have an agreement to forgo penalty rates in favour of being paid above award hourly rates. So while the Ipswich fish and chip shop may pay an extra few dollars an hour in wages on a Sunday, the McDonalds next door pays a couple of bucks extra an hour to staff Monday through to Friday, but you won’t hear Hanson or Turnbull talking about that.

As for the myth of trickle-down economics that the Coalition keep referring to, all the evidence points the other way. In Australia business sector profits are on the rise and CEO salaries are on the rise, yet wages growth is on the decline. Business is pocketing the extra profits while the worker gets left behind financially and while the workforce is casualised.


New Coalition - No Nats needed - Image News Ltd

New Coalition – No Nats needed – Image News Ltd

Where I do agree with the Coalition however is the idea of helping small business in their hour of need, although I wonder if this is indeed that hour.

Only a week ago Scott Morrison was patting himself on the back and talking up the government economic performance after better than expected economic figures were released. One of the areas with a marked improvement was consumer spending. So if consumer spending is up and the retail sector is supposedly struggling then where exactly are we to believe these consumers are spending their money?

Penalty rates are not a new invention. Businesses who haven’t planned ahead for existing wage structures are businesses that have planned to fail. Why should businesses that plan to fail be bailed out by staff?

I know some small businesses are doing it tough, particularly in regional communities, however I’m equally sure that asking the lowest paid workers on the tax scale to subsidise them is certainly not the correct or the fair approach. I mean let’s be clear, by transferring the money from the workers pocket to the businesses coffers subsidising the boss is exactly what we are asking of the workers. Perhaps if the government is so keen to see these businesses open on Sundays or subsidised they could offer an incentive to small business instead of handing $50 Billion to the big end of town in the form of tax cuts as the Coalition has planned.

Despite what some think, most politicians work exceptionally long hours, most often attending events on weekends and evenings. This is why politicians are paid handsomely for their efforts and the extra hours that are expected of them. However it would seem many politicians like Malcolm Turnbull and Pauline Hanson think that hospitality and retail workers should do the extra hours for peanuts.

This is one of the reasons people believe politicians are out of touch.

The decision to sacrifice our lowest paid workers standard of living at the altar of greed is something we all need to fight, because at the moment while it may just be hospitality and retail workers, your industry could be next.

Like Wixxyleaks on Facebook here

Like Wixxyleaks on Facebook here

5 thoughts on “Masses Like Asses – Turnbull’s record on evidence penalises us

  1. It is weekly wage that counts. Penalty rates are only part salary packet. No one, even the honourable PM. these people ate highly paid. Especially as most of the work is hard and often hot.

    Small business face many more rising costs than wages.

    Are they going to demand electricity, rent. insurance, transport & produce suppliers lower the prices so they can survive. Suspect not, this is expected only of workers.

    I have a funny feeling FWC decision has set up PM. It is like the curate egg, good and bad. It is a bad decision that benefits no one.

  2. Thanks Peter, yes it is actually as simple as you describe it.

    Turnbull and now Barnett probably still controlled by Howard, purely for political ideological greed, have deliberately put Hanson, a known unstable dangerous Hate speech wild card, into power with verbal immunity for six years because they can be comfortable with her.
    We choose our friends.

    They prefer Hanson to the Australian people. That simple. Next they will choose who? Australian patriots?

    Don’t forget this is the same LNP who dragged their feet on inquiries to protect the church and it’s financial assets from inquiries into child abuse for decades. If they didn’t even care about Australian children we must ask who are they? But for Gillard’s Royal commission would the LNP still be covering it up?

    Who the f*ck are these people we have ‘looking’ after us?

    Thanks Pete been missing wiki leaks but know your busy, making do with your twitter, remain in awe at your research on Jackson hope you can keep it up.

  3. You have explained the contradictions in the government’s arguments very clearly, Peter. Unfortunately, the illogicality of the government’s presentation is not apparent those who are bewildered by the dogmatically expressed confidence of the likes of Turnbull and Morrison who replace rational argument with dogmatic assertion.

  4. typo nah my stupidity – Sorry meant to say been missing wixxyleaks above, please keep it up, regards

  5. The weekly wages bill for any business that is open on weekends should already have penalty rates factored in and so the cost of the products it sells should also include that cost.

    Therefore the coffee you buy on Monday should already include the cost of the penalty rates incurred by staff who work on Sunday – otherwise prices should be lower on weekdays.

    If a coffee shop or restaurant can’t survive on weekends (probably their busiest time) perhaps they shouldn’t be in business at all. Other businesses seem to survive. Why single out a couple of examples for punitive treatment – unless it’s to create a “new community standard” to be imposed next time Enterprise Agreements come up for renewal?

Leave a Reply