There is little doubt that life is becoming tougher under an Abbott government, and it seems poised to become even tougher.

With the unemployment level reaching dizzy heights it hasn’t reached since John Howard was in The Lodge, and the cost of living heading in a Northerly direction, I thought I’d offer some words of comfort that my mum used to say for those struggling to make ends meet.

“At least you have your health, and that’s the most important thing.”

Wise words indeed.

I’m sure many mothers used to say the same thing, however I wonder if Tony Abbott’s mother ever said it. If she did it doesn’t seem to have sunk in, or perhaps that he doesn’t care if poor health is other people’s problem.

In continuing with Liberal ideology that says certain things should only be for the rich, you know, little things like a fair trial or a quality education, Tony Abbott seems determined to add quality of health to the list of things only the rich should enjoy.

Wave goodbye to your standard of living little people...

Wave goodbye to your standard of living little people…

It was something that actually made us glad to have Jacqui Lambie in the Senate. I’m referring to the dumping of the Coalitions plans for a $7 charge to see a doctor, after all this plan was only abandoned once it became apparent the plan would not pass through the Senate.  The Coalition referred to it as a GP co-payment at the time, the country however thought of it as a kick in the guts.

Not only that, there was some creative accounting being done behind the scenes with Joe Hockey’s calculator that seemingly goes to 11. The money raised by the tax was supposed to make the Medicare system more sustainable, however it was going to be put into a Medical Research Fund. The savings to the government were based on the notion that given the cost of a GP visit Australians were expected to go to  the doctor less and hence save the government money. A forward thinking person may think that a lower standard of health through less doctors visits may have an impact later on hospital admissions, but alas, there was not a forward thinker to be found in the Coalition caucus.

Luckily we had a Senate with enough sense to save us from this oncoming train wreck, and it never went through.

However we were not saved for long.

Tony Abbott has claimed to have heard Australians voices on a number of the unfair elements of his budget and wants us to think he is making changes accordingly.

If health is supposed to be one of the things Abbott is sending a new message to the nation on, then that message translated is simply “Screw You”.

As a means of going around the Senate to have his great big new Sick Tax implemented Abbott and his former henchman come Health Minister Peter Dutton concocted a scheme to cut the rebate paid to doctors, thus forcing doctors to have two options, charge the patients or effectively halve their income.

However given it is a Coalition government we are talking about even something this simple could not be done without a major screw up.

Slow down Joe, I can't keep up...

Lurch leaves the health portfolio…

The changes were announced by Dumb and Dumber, Dutton and Abbott on December 9 came with a “fact-sheet” to the industry that was anything but. According to the fact sheet doctors that have not completed GP specialisation would receive a higher rebate than those that have.

You could be forgiven for thinking that Abbott and co were preferring us to see witch doctors, medicine men, or gypsies with crystals rather than a specialist GP.

Twelve days later crisis was averted when changes were made to the definitions of Medicare items for non-specialised GP’s.

So what are the changes and how will they affect us?

The changes to the rebate for doctors cut the rebate for a visit by a non-concessional patient of between five and 10 minutes from $37.05 to $16.95 for a specialist GP, and from $21 to $11 for a non-specialist GP. That’s around a 50% cut, more for a specialist.

For most that will mean that the sick tax has gone from $7 to $20. What it also means is that if you go to a GP that bulk bills, after the 19th January when the sick tax kicks in there is a very good chance they won’t be bulk billing anymore.

Another issue will be that the doctors’ visits will be longer as the rebate is less affected by longer visits, thus drastically increasing waiting times for patients.

Don’t be surprised if some members of the Coalition try to blame this on the Senate for refusing to allow the original $7 sick tax pass Senate.

However we can expect the Coalition spin doctors and MP’s to tell us all how the Medicare system must be sustainable and how the government had to stem the bleeding of funds from the budget due to those who rort the system by seeing a doctor too often.

However there are other ways to make Medicare more sustainable than by implementing a sick tax.

Abbott wants every doctors visit to feel like this

Abbott hopes every doctors visit will feel like this, and they just may…

Not wanting to be one of those who criticises without offering a solution here’s one from me.

We should look to scrapping the discount on the Medicare Levy for those with private health insurance.

The majority of those with private health insurance still end up in a public hospital using a public hospital bed and the same staff as the rest of us.

People don’t choose where they have a heart attack, or plan where they are involved in a car accident, so often in emergency situations many of the benefits of private health insurance cover are about as useful as a unicycle is to your pet goldfish.

Nevertheless despite using the public health system the government still offers them a discount for having insurance while those that don’t have insurance subsidise their stay in hospital.

The rich being subsidised by the poor. For those of you thinking this must have been a John Howard initiative you would be right and let’s not forget that Tony Abbott was Health Minister under Howard. Despite Labor’s best efforts to fix this ridiculous reverse logic scenario there has been little or no support from the other parties to correct this.

While the Coalitions insurance company lobbyist mates rub their hands together, the middle class welfare continues as we all are forced into paying a sick tax.

Welfare is designed to help those that need it most, however we currently have a government that seems to think differently.

As we have already seen, this governments sights are firmly set on the unemployed, the pensioners, and the disabled, or “the leaners” as they are often referred to. That trend seems set to continue as the Coalitions middle-class welfare gravy train continues on.

In another twist to this debate, the sick tax coming into force on January 19th will push a hospital system already struggling under Coalition State and Federal cuts closer towards breaking point. This in turn will add to the pressure on the state governments to call for changes to the GST.

How convenient.

 

paypal_donate_button

Save Wixxy from his own budget crisis by donating here

Shirts Ad pic

 

 

 

 

Like Wixxyleaks on Facebook here

Like Wixxyleaks on Facebook here

 

10 thoughts on “Medicine Train – The Sick Tax is coming January 19th

  1. “As we have already seen, this governments sites are firmly set” you mean ‘sights’, don’t you? Good article. I think the sights are much further than a higher GST. Abbott cares nothing for the poor, the elderly or the sick. He doesn’t seem to care much for the Original people either. I think his purpose is far more sinister – to kill off as many of us ‘leaners’ as he can. I think his ‘religion’ is closer to the Gerry Harvey principle.

  2. I took my 8 year old to the doctor last week and she was diagnosed with a staph infection.I was in the surgery less than 10 minutes and it cost me $103.00, plus the medication. I dont have a health care card and my husband is only employed as a casual and has no work at the moment. Centrelink tells me that unless he is sacked or quits we are not entitled to anything. Plus, I live 40 kms from the nearest town and petrol is still $1.38.

  3. As you can see, the Libertarian Ideology is beginning to take effect. Pity help we the ordinary people of Australia. Pity help our once environmentally beautiful and diverse land, pity help our future. The IPA and Murdoch are now in charge, and we have a compliant ABC to boot.

  4. Yes Andrea this government is conning us, or what could also likely, have no ideas how Medicare works. We already pay our fair share plus levy.

  5. They are now alleging doctors provide poor health services with short consultations. Originally the argument was they had to send price signal to prevent over use of services by patients.

    It is their own prejudices plus what they see as circumstantial evidence that bought them to this belief.

    Truth is, there is no evidence to support their beliefs.

    As they no longer listen or even ask their department or experts, they as usual,, have it wrong.

    The aim is to undermine Medicare, leading to it’s demise. Doctors today no longer want this.

  6. Peter, regarding your solution: it is certainly one way to cut costs. While I don’t have an issue with it, private health insurance (even with the rebate) is a costly premium when compared with home insurance (understood that there are many more insured) which covers many hundreds of thousands of dollars. Of course it is only expensive until you realise its benefits upon major surgery & hospitalisation. One way to recoup public system health costs is if in an emergency a person is rushed to a public hospital that that hospital be able to make a claim against a person’s private health fund. Another solution is to raise the medicare levy on the rich if they do not have private health fund cover. This augments the need for the public sector to seek recompense for costs incurred with any patient having private health cover. Of course there is no reason why a person undergoing emergency treatment in a public hospital cannot be required to be transferred to the private system once that emergency passes especially where it is for an extended period.

  7. well well they must be getting a bit worried. Or is he setting up for an early election like his short shadow up north?

  8. I suspect he is on his knees daily, for relief from the polls to go early. Will not be a DD. To risky. Sure to end up with worse senate. What is the earliest he can go for Lower House alone election. Abbott has great faith in his ability when electioneering. Suspect he is not worried, as he sees himself as being infallible.

    Abbott, as his personality seems to indicate, is on a mission. A mission too undermine and undo society as we know it.

    With Abbott, it all about being on war footing. All is a battle, which he leads.

    Her is so paranoid, that all are his enemy. Suspect this includes his backbench, along with some, mainly women ministers.

    With Abbott, it is all payback

Leave a Reply